The data is being used by fraudsters - one customer I spoke to said that £10 transactions had gone through his Maestro card. Fraudsters use "taster" £10 transactions because they are small and confirm the card is still active before selling the details on.
The big question that I'm seeking an answer to:
- Why wasn't the system PCI DSS compliant? because if it was then the card numbers would have not been available to those that stole the data. The 3rd PCI DSS data security requirement specifically says that cardholder data has to be 'protected' - were not just talking database passwords; it has to be encrypted wherever the PAN + data is used, including log files.
- Why was credit card data older than 2 months still be stored? The 3rd PCI DSS also says that cardholder data must not be stored for longer than necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for adding a comment; I moderate all posts.